Writing a Summary

                  Prof. F. Mathias

                  Prof. K. Riley

 

Here is a basic formula for writing successful summaries.  It starts by giving you a mnemonic device for remembering what to do when you have to write one.

 

 

Summaries make me sick, so CURE ME!

 

The CURE tells you HOW to write your summary; the ME tells you WHAT to include in it.

 

 

      Condensed:              Use only necessary words or phrases.

 

                                          Say an idea only once; don’t repeat.

                                         

                                          The summary should be the length requested

                                             or no more than 1/3 the length of the original

                                             article.                                             

 

      Unbiased:                  Leave out "I" and any personal opinion.

 

      REstated:                  Put the author's ideas in your own words.

                                                                 

 

 

     Main Idea:              Start with the author’s name followed by a       

                                             verb like  “says, claims, believes, suggests”

                                             and then the central point of the article.                                       

                                             The central point corresponds to the Topic

                                             Sentence in the TREE diagram. 

 

Essential Points: Include all major supports in the article and            

                                       and only the minor supports needed to

                                       explain them.  Major supports are Reasons;

                                       minor supports are Explanations and    

                                       Examples.

 

                                    Omit long, direct quotes, unnecessary minor   

   supports and a conclusion for the summary.

 

 

Original Passage:

 

The door opens.  Dr. Michael DeBakey enters and walks quickly to the operating table.  His assistants have already opened the patient’s chest and removed the diseased heart.  With the skill and precision of a master, DeBakey transplants a healthy donor heart into the patient’s chest.  It takes about an hour.  When DeBakey finishes, he leaves the operating suite and goes to the scrub room.  He takes off his operating clothes, scrubs down, and puts on clean, sterilized clothes.  In a matter of minutes, he enters another operating suite, and the whole process starts over.  In a normal working day, DeBakey operates on five to nine patients.  He normally spend 12-15 hours a day, seven days a week, in the hospital and performs as many heart operations in one month as most surgeons do in a year.  There is one more thing you should know about DeBakey.  He is over 80 years old (San Diego Tribune, November 27, 1987).

 

There are two primary reasons Dr. Michael DeBakey functions so successfully in such a potentially stressful environment.  The first is that he appraises these situations—doing complicated heart transplants—as challenges rather than as threats.  The advantage of challenge appraisals is that they help a person focus on making particular decisions or solving particular problems.  In turn, problem-focused coping brings out positive feelings and emotions, such as excitement and eagerness, which help reduce stress levels.  In contrast, threat appraisals elicit negative emotional feelings, such as fear or anxiety, which raise levels of stress.  Because emotion-focused coping is directed at managing negative emotional feelings, the person isn’t motivated to solve his or her problem.

 

A second reason DeBakey functions so well is that he has a winning combination

of  personality factors that help him perform under great stress.  Specifically, he has what is known as a hardy personality.  (307 words)

 

                                                From Introduction to Psychology, 5e, by Ron Plotnick

 

 

 

Sample Summary:

 

Ron Plotnick offers two reasons why Dr. Michael DeBakey, a heart surgeon in his eighties, can work twelve-hour days every day.  First, the doctor views his work of transplanting hearts as a challenge instead of a threat.  Because he focuses on solving problems, he enjoys good feelings that relieve stress.  People who perceive a circumstance as a threat focus on bad emotions; thus, they create tension and do not improve the situation.  Next, Dr. DeBakey has a “hardy personality” or several emotional traits that allow him to withstand the stress of his difficult occupation.  (94 words)

 

 

Writing a Summary based on the TREE outline

 

If you are familiar with the Three-TREE sandwich model for writing a basic paragraph, you can adapt it for writing a summary.

 

First, look at the diagram for writing summaries and notice that it has some but not all of the same parts. Also, the labels for the parts are different.

 

Now, learn the names of the parts for a summary:

 

Topic Sentence = Central point.  This is the main idea of the passage.

           

 

            Transition Words = First, / Next, / Finally, .  Use these words in your summary.

 

            Reason = Major Support.  This is a claim or opinion for believing the central point.

 

            Explanation and Example = Minor Support.  These are details that help to explain the major support.  Include ONLY as much of these parts as is necessary for your reader to understand the vocabulary and ideas in the major support. In general, specific examples are too detailed to include in a summary.

 

A Summary Contains                                               A Summary Omits

 

Topic Sentence/Central Point                                 Background information

Transition Word + ,                                                   Unneeded Explanation

    Reason/Major Support                                         Unneeded Examples

Needed Explanation/Minor Support                       Conclusion

Needed Examples/Minor Support

 

If you compare the Three-TREE Sandwich to the Summary diagram, you will see the reason for the color of the circles in each TREE.  The colors correspond to those in a traffic signal.

 

Green means “Go” or definitely include the Reason in the summary.

 

Orange means “Caution” or use only the information in an Explanation needed to make the Reason clear. Sometimes, this information will be marked off with italics, numbers, letters or bullets in a passage.

 

            Red means “Stop” or avoid using Examples in your summary.  They generally contain specific details that would make your summary too long. In some cases, however, when an author gives only examples to support a reason, then the examples become necessary support.


Return to TREE Homepage